Anti globalization movement

 The reason for the rise of anti globalization movement refers to the question of why people want to fight against globalization. Why do people want anti globalization? It is because there are many serious problems in the process of globalization, especially social problems; it is because with the continuous progress of globalization, the world is increasingly divided; it is because the globalization led by the west can not treat every country in the world fairly, and can not treat the majority of the world's people fairly; it is because, as an objective trend, as a natural historical process If globalization continues on this track, the future of human real and complete liberation will be far away, and mankind will face the danger of destruction. This is by no means alarmist. Fidel Castro, chairman of the State Council of Cuba, solemnly pointed out to the delegates at the UN Conference on environment and Development held in June 1992 that "as the natural conditions for its existence rapidly and continuously disappear, an important biological species - Human - is in danger of extinction." (Fidel Castro: globalization and modern capitalism, P. 149, social science literature press, 2000 EDITION) people's understanding of the nature of globalization is increasingly profound, and people are more and more keenly aware of the disasters brought about by the process of globalization. It is for this series of reasons that people finally begin to act. As a result, we finally see that anti globalization movements have broken out in all parts of the world.

Comments

  1. Piotr KoniecznyOctober 6, 2020 at 8:01 PM

    Interesting aspect, the anti globalization movement is certainly worth thinking about!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to our blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Fall 2020 class in Sociology of Globalization at the Hanyang University in Korea will discuss their weekly readings and activities. For each section of the course, you are expected to post a blog post on relevant readings on our blog here and make a comment on another student's post. An ideal commentary should be about 800 words, divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incorporated into our class discussions. You are allowed to quote an interesting passage from the text(s) you've read, but the quotes will not count toward any length requirements. Blog’s deadline is always: Sunday, midnight, of the week the question is posted. Re
Read more

What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes? / Jeong hye min

 Naver and Google can access various information and articles using search engines. In particular, Google does not have a lot of information other than information search and unnecessary advertisements, and there are many papers.  On the contrary, Naver is often unsuitable because there are many advertisements on blogs and uncertain sites that are sponsored or written for manuscript fees. Google is not classified in categories, making it difficult to find the information it wants.
Read more

[Reading 2] What is the relation between culture and globalization? / Jeong hye min

  Summary   Culture and globalization have realistic limitations in terms of interacting with each other that globalization is bound to be a problem in culture as negotiations of cultural experience are used in strategies to intervene in areas such as politics, environment, economy, etc. Interesting point  Marx and Cultural Globalization Marx argued that what they saw in the progress of ultra-national capitalism as ultimately and in a positive way was the subject of historical change: 'Everywhere should be established, settled everywhere, and connected everywhere.' These are exactly the opposite situations for cultural critics today. Discussion  C ulture as a dimension of globalization
Read more