The fight between proponents and opponents of taxation is very visible in many countries, including the USA. Is such fight visible in your country?/PARK HYE MIN(박혜민)

 This kind of fight is also taking place in Korea. In particular, Gangnam-gu in Seoul and Seocho-gu in Seoul are the most affluent areas in Korea. The number of habitual defaulters disclosed by the National Tax Service is about 39,000, indicating that they can be easily seen around us. The ostensible reason why they do not pay taxes is that their business is ruined and they have no assets, but the area where they actually live shows that they live in an area that cannot be called moneyless.

 In South Korea, inheritance and gift taxes are the least taxable part of the country. Frankly speaking, inheritance tax is a property received from parents, and if they received enough property to pay taxes, they do not even pay taxes on it, but the direction and method of dealing with it seems weaker than in other countries. In this regard, it has become a reality that Korea has no choice but to be perceived as a country easy to live in if it has a lot of money.

 Among the recent issues related to inheritance tax, various comments were posted on the article that the inheritance tax that children have to pay in the process of inheriting their wealth due to the death of Samsung Chairman Lee Kun-hee. The main point is that Samsung is a large part of Korea's economy and has made great contributions, which critics say may be paying too much tax. Against this backdrop, some think that the government is collecting taxes from the people, but is not using the taxes it has collected properly, leading to the opinion that the nation should reduce the inheritance tax it has to receive from Samsung Group.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

is such fight visible in your country?

Summary) Currently, Korea is confused. The sudden increase in taxes and various regulations greatly affected housing and salaries. It's a real mess right now. With the inauguration of the new administration, our country has become very difficult. They're taking all the money away from the people who are misleading the people. This is very wrong. Rich people are stealing money even though they didn't save it by doing bad things. Poor people hiding stirred up the government's fault. As a result, the fight between the poor and the rich continues. It is very wrong to do this. Interesting) Many countries are fighting with taxes. Is this really right? The country should be united, but each of them is fighting for each other's right. This is very wrong, and we'll have to get it right soon. Question) What are we going to do? What can we do for those who are instigated? They are no longer tempted by the government to think properly. What can we help you with?
Read more

The history of globalization

 In a broad sense of globalization, that is, in terms of social communication across national boundaries and regions, globalization has already existed, but it has become more significant in recent decades. Regarding the starting point of globalization, although academic circles have not yet reached a consensus, they generally agree that globalization is not a matter of recent decades, but has a longer history. This section will talk about the different stages of globalization and its characteristics in history. Characteristics of different periods of globalization in history Fragmented early globalization Period: before human beings sailed around the world Features: scattered, lack of systematic international communication Main globalization activities: Trade-such as exporting spices and silk from Asia to Europe Religion-such as the Tang Sanzang taking the Western Classics Military-such as Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, Tang Taizong and other military expansion The rise and co...
Read more

[Blog Project Assignment 2] Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory / Yang Ruixin

Image
  1、Power distance Power distance is the degree of power and dictatorship of leadership in an organization, and the extent to which a society can accept the inequality of power distribution in an organization. China's index is 80, and people generally agree that power inequality in organizations, the relationship between superiors and subordinates tends to be polarized, and subordinates can not resist the authority of their superiors, and subordinates are willing to be instructed and led. Actions beyond power are not advocated. This may be because of China's socialist system, the Communist Party of China in China is a one-party ruling, everyone has become accustomed to this system. Australia's index is 36. In various organizations in Australia, hierarchies are established for convenience needs and superiors are approachable. Managers rely on the expertise and skills of employees and information and advice are often exchanged between superiors and subordinates. Communicati...
Read more