[Blog Assigment 1] WVS analysis : Justifiable: Divorce, Justifiable: Euthanasia




The results are based on a survey of China, Germany, Japan, South Korea and the United States on the legitimacy of state divorce.

First of all, China (39.9 percent) argues that divorce cannot be strongly justified.

This figure shows the tendency of conservative China.

On the contrary, Germany, which values secularism and self-expression, showed 42.8 percent that divorce was always justified.

This shows that the perception of divorce is open. 

It can be seen as a little more biased toward the perception that Japan and the U.S. have neutral perceptions but can be justified.

The figures to pay attention to are Koreans, with 4.0 percent strongly opposed to divorce and 1.0 percent strongly justified divorce, showing a balanced view of divorce.

Although the perception of divorce was bad in Korea due to the strong Confucian ideology, the data shows that the negative perception of divorce has been diluted a lot recently. 

It can be seen that Korea is becoming more embracing divorce as time goes by.


The second results are based on a survey of China, Germany, Japan, South Korea and the United States on the legitimacy of state Euthanasia.

China's 44.5 percent that euthanasia can never be justified and Germany's 34.8 percent that euthanasia can be strongly justified are impressive.

It can be seen that the United States and Japan have a neutral perception of euthanasia.

South Korea posted a low 0.5 percent on items that strongly justify euthanasia.It is natural to have a negative perception of euthanasia in Korea, where Confucian ideas are strong.

But just as the perception of divorce is changing over time, the perception of euthanasia between generations is likely to change and accept it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

is such fight visible in your country?

Summary) Currently, Korea is confused. The sudden increase in taxes and various regulations greatly affected housing and salaries. It's a real mess right now. With the inauguration of the new administration, our country has become very difficult. They're taking all the money away from the people who are misleading the people. This is very wrong. Rich people are stealing money even though they didn't save it by doing bad things. Poor people hiding stirred up the government's fault. As a result, the fight between the poor and the rich continues. It is very wrong to do this. Interesting) Many countries are fighting with taxes. Is this really right? The country should be united, but each of them is fighting for each other's right. This is very wrong, and we'll have to get it right soon. Question) What are we going to do? What can we do for those who are instigated? They are no longer tempted by the government to think properly. What can we help you with?
Read more

The history of globalization

 In a broad sense of globalization, that is, in terms of social communication across national boundaries and regions, globalization has already existed, but it has become more significant in recent decades. Regarding the starting point of globalization, although academic circles have not yet reached a consensus, they generally agree that globalization is not a matter of recent decades, but has a longer history. This section will talk about the different stages of globalization and its characteristics in history. Characteristics of different periods of globalization in history Fragmented early globalization Period: before human beings sailed around the world Features: scattered, lack of systematic international communication Main globalization activities: Trade-such as exporting spices and silk from Asia to Europe Religion-such as the Tang Sanzang taking the Western Classics Military-such as Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, Tang Taizong and other military expansion The rise and co...
Read more

[Blog Project Assignment 2] Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory / Yang Ruixin

Image
  1、Power distance Power distance is the degree of power and dictatorship of leadership in an organization, and the extent to which a society can accept the inequality of power distribution in an organization. China's index is 80, and people generally agree that power inequality in organizations, the relationship between superiors and subordinates tends to be polarized, and subordinates can not resist the authority of their superiors, and subordinates are willing to be instructed and led. Actions beyond power are not advocated. This may be because of China's socialist system, the Communist Party of China in China is a one-party ruling, everyone has become accustomed to this system. Australia's index is 36. In various organizations in Australia, hierarchies are established for convenience needs and superiors are approachable. Managers rely on the expertise and skills of employees and information and advice are often exchanged between superiors and subordinates. Communicati...
Read more