Blog assignment(1) -corruption of state(kim ji min)
The table above summarizes the answers to the nation's corruption. I compared the countries of East Asia by comparing Korea, China, and Japan.
All three countries were perceived to be more corrupt than less corrupt. In cases like Korea, the ratio of six to seven points was nearly half, while China and Japan had far higher 10 points than Korea, instead of five to eight.
Now I will compare the state, business executives, and the media.
When comparing the countries, the perception of Korea was the worst. There was a strong perception that China was partially corrupt, and the Republic of Korea was mostly the Republic of Korea, and the peculiar thing about Japan was that there was no answer. China is a socialist country, so there is little negative reaction to the country, and Korea has historically been interested in politics, and Japan seems to have little participation because of its separate emperor and prime minister system.
I looked into the media's perception of corruption. Since it is socialism, China had very little awareness of corruption in the media, and Japan and the Republic of Korea had the same percentage as the previous vote.
Finally, it is an analysis of companies. The perception of companies is similar to the previous vote, but in China, the perception of corporate corruption is relatively higher when compared with the state, media and corruption. Japan and the Republic of Korea have similar figures as those of the previous ones, but Korea has a higher overall negative view of corporate executives.
Overall, this difference in perception is seen as a national difference. Since China is a socialist country, I think there are many controlled things. Therefore, what can be seen is fragmentary and Japan has a little less interest in the country. The rate of "I don't know" was very high. Korea is historically very passionate and combative about the affairs of the state, such as politics. Such effects are expressed numerically.
Comments
Post a Comment