Blog assingment2 Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory/Han seung gu

 I researched England, Korea, and China through the Hopsteade's cultural dimension theory.

Power distance was China's highest with 80, while Britain's was the lowest. Through this, it is easy to accept patriarchal power relations in China, and it is easy for subordinates to accept them. Britain can see that power relations are more interdiscriminatory and democratic.
Individualism was unrivaledly high in Britain. This means that individual rights in the UK are of considerable value and that they act as individuals rather than as members of the organization. China and Korea were about 20 similar.

Korea had the highest Uncertificate Avoidance. This means that Korea is more cautious in its emotional trends and social changes. China and Britain saw the figure as low as 30.

Masculinity was equal in China and England at 66. Through this, it can be seen that the two countries value competitiveness, self-assertion and ambition. Korea had a figure of 39 and emphasized the concept of commitment more than the two countries.

Long term orientation showed Korea at 100. This means that Korea is giving more value to the future of society. The United Kingdom stood at 50, indicating that it is more conservative than South Korea.

Indergence was low in Asian countries and high in Britain. This shows that Asian countries have low levels of indelgence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

is such fight visible in your country?

Summary) Currently, Korea is confused. The sudden increase in taxes and various regulations greatly affected housing and salaries. It's a real mess right now. With the inauguration of the new administration, our country has become very difficult. They're taking all the money away from the people who are misleading the people. This is very wrong. Rich people are stealing money even though they didn't save it by doing bad things. Poor people hiding stirred up the government's fault. As a result, the fight between the poor and the rich continues. It is very wrong to do this. Interesting) Many countries are fighting with taxes. Is this really right? The country should be united, but each of them is fighting for each other's right. This is very wrong, and we'll have to get it right soon. Question) What are we going to do? What can we do for those who are instigated? They are no longer tempted by the government to think properly. What can we help you with?
Read more

[Blog Project Assignment 2] Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory / Yang Ruixin

Image
  1、Power distance Power distance is the degree of power and dictatorship of leadership in an organization, and the extent to which a society can accept the inequality of power distribution in an organization. China's index is 80, and people generally agree that power inequality in organizations, the relationship between superiors and subordinates tends to be polarized, and subordinates can not resist the authority of their superiors, and subordinates are willing to be instructed and led. Actions beyond power are not advocated. This may be because of China's socialist system, the Communist Party of China in China is a one-party ruling, everyone has become accustomed to this system. Australia's index is 36. In various organizations in Australia, hierarchies are established for convenience needs and superiors are approachable. Managers rely on the expertise and skills of employees and information and advice are often exchanged between superiors and subordinates. Communicati...
Read more

Reading 2. What is the relation between culture and globalization? / Kim Yoon(김윤)

Summary John Tomlinson wrote a paper on the correlation between globalization and culture. Today, globalization is well known as a multidimensional process in which areas of economy, politics, technology, media, environment and culture taking place simultaneously. In addition, the boundaries between them are vague and often appear to be joined together. This connectivity increases and affects human life. Therefore, understanding these trends makes us keep in mind the complex and multidimensional processes between them. John saw this understanding as inseparable from the capitalist system, citing two reasons. The first is because we are not making simple imperialist judgments with this. Second, because this distorts understanding at the cultural level.   One of the common speculations about globalization is that it will lead to a single world culture. There is a reason why this seems possible. Because we can see a unified effect, especially in connecting other spiritual memories, s...
Read more