What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes? / Jeong hye min

 Naver and Google can access various information and articles using search engines. In particular, Google does not have a lot of information other than information search and unnecessary advertisements, and there are many papers.

 On the contrary, Naver is often unsuitable because there are many advertisements on blogs and uncertain sites that are sponsored or written for manuscript fees. Google is not classified in categories, making it difficult to find the information it wants.


Comments

  1. I also agree that Google is helpful as a search tool because it has many papers and materials! I was also interested in your reference to Naver's recent case of using an opaque blog for money while the space for people's vivid opinions is active compared to Google.
    By the way, you said it is difficult to find the information you want because Google is not classified into categories, but I think differently about this. Naver and Google have a feature called 'Advanced Settings(상세 검색/고급 설정)' right near the search box. It is a function that allows us to quickly and accurately find out what I want to find by controlling the scope of information on the vast Internet. Google has more types of this feature than Naver. So while it's true that when we use Google or Naver as a search tool, it's sometimes inconvenient that we're not classified into the category you've mentioned, I think Google also has a function that can almost completely complement this point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good job guys discussing this (also the comment is longer than the blog.... that's rare). Keep up the good job!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to our blog

[Reading 2] What is the relation between culture and globalization? / Jeong hye min