What is the relation between politics and globalization? / Choi Jaemin

 

Summary

 

This paper deals with the globalization of politics. Basically, globalization led to the decline of nationalism and played a major role in changing the political system and style based on such ideology. Here, we can understand political globalization as a trend. Global geopolitics and normative culture and multipolar networks. Between these three processes tension arises to create a complex field of world politics. One of the most common forms of political globalization is that it is widespread around the world.
A parliamentary state-based democratic government exists in all parts of the world in some form. Globalization does not undermine democratic countries, but gives them acceptability worldwide.

The concept of decline in a post-statistical world without government between nations, or in a new world, should be replaced by the idea of continuous transformation, according to Omae, 1996.
Also, according to Sorensen in 2004, the sovereign actor must be rejected, and the state continues to be a powerful actor, but it exists in a more globally connected world. Many countries are now more embodied by globalization, the country's political community does not exercise sovereignty over the state, and the state has lost much of its sovereignty. World cities, for example, are a product of the emancipation of national states.

Communication is the center of politics. The country is based on a centralized communication system. Most nationalism has been based on an increasingly standardized national language over time, and political parties have been at the center of a large body of political communication that has been used socially. Political globalization is best illustrated in terms of these changes in political communication and future changes.

World society has a promise to solve the contradictory tendency that has become the center of its experience. The first contradiction is the increasing homogenization tendency and emphasis of globalization, and the second is the contradiction within the individualization force of globalization. The centrality of the world civil society against political globalization leads to the emergence of transnational movements and networks in its position. Moreover, the global civil society weakens the importance of a territorial state favorable to a new type of networked opposition.

 

The word "world without borders" has long been associated with the idea of globalization. The process of transcending borders, annihilating streets and uniting through global disasters provided its value. This leads to an interesting paradox, where we are increasingly conscious of diminishing dimensions or compression. As we focus on new spaces and new forms of connectivity, we realize that space is a social and political structure. Also, political relations and space management, not just given with territory, are no longer seen as agenda items on the agenda.

According to the summary here, the development of governance and world political culture is partly effective in keeping the country stable. The central question generated by political globalization refers to the degree to which it leads to the division of the social world. Also, the loss of political autonomy and democracy and civil socialization are complex. As such, one can point to the dilemma these compounds have.

Impressive Part

In fact, when we think about the globalization of politics, the most questionable and most curious thing is that politics is based on the specificity and ethnicity of the nation.
In fact, in the case of social and cultural globalization, I think there will be fewer problems than political globalization. It's not entirely at the cultural level, but it's because there's no rigid rules and it's a kind of unwritten rule that's created by conventional wisdom for everyone.

However, politics must clearly be different from culture and any other area. I think the political part of the country is very difficult to globalize and will cause a lot of confusion.
As the study also explains, countries like China certainly take a different form of democracy than we can generally think of politically.
If we pursue political globalization with these countries, there will certainly be a lot of problems, confusion, and dilemmas that we've mentioned in our research, so I think the term political globalization is basically a contradiction.
But in this study, there were also a lot of descriptions of my critical views. I was able to read the research with a lot of empathy, and in conclusion, I didn't change my mind.

Question

Then I want to know what you think.
What do you think about the globalization of politics? It's a very comprehensive and abstract question, so to be more specific, do you think it's possible for politics to be globalized in reality? If possible, do you think it will be more beneficial for the country and for the rest of the world to realize it?

To answer first, I don't think so. The political arena certainly manifests itself in the peculiarities of the state. I don't think there's a global infrastructure in place to be globalized.