Blog Assignment 3 - Political Globalization

 

Political globalization, we argue, can be understood as a tension between three strategies that interact to produce the complicated discipline of international politics: world geopolitics, international normative way of life, and polycentric networks.

While globalization requires the existence of world players such as powerful states to diffuse and enforce world geopolitics, there is every other dimension of globalization that is much less associated with states and which is now not reducible to international normative culture. Whilst the world political order represented through the United Nations is generally based on nation-states, it is possible to communicate a specific variety of international political order that can be related to the idea of global civil society.

Although there is no simple consensus on the nature and dynamics of world civil society, we can say that it often refers to a complicated of NGO-led political campaigns, transborder social moves, and transnational advocacy networks which have developed global attain and/or address problems of world concern, and which are considered as pressure for exact and work to undertaking the institutionalization of the hegemony of nation-states and/or world capitalism.

The power of global processes to transcend countrywide borders, annihilate distance and unite through global disaster has provided the globalization literature with a vary of effective metaphors: the 'global village'; 'world polity'; 'fragile earth'. There exist interpretations of world transformation which focus on the emergence of a couple of and jointly based 'levels' of the political corporation - local, regional, national, supra or transnational, global: globalization as a continuum with the nearby at one quit and the international at the other. Second, world normative culture, which has been disseminated by way of INGOs over a lengthy length of time and has scripted the improvement of the nation-state as a global form, has additionally acted as a vector for global norms of personhood positing a world of humans sustained by means of human rights law.

It is said that the political normative system is increasingly being established by the NGOs and the UN. Could this global civil society have been established like this? In my opinion, organizations are not the only factor that leads to this globalization. Rather, each countries’ different interests are the main reason. The concept of civil society itself is not a strong method that can guide globalization.

Looking at the relationship between China and the United States, for example, we can find a structure in which factories and consumers are completely separated into one large global society. In the end, it can be seen that the root of the reason for establishing political regulation as a global citizen stems from the interests of each country. Therefore, if the political interests of each country rise and what they want from each other severely conflict, this organization I think there is plenty of room for collapse. For this reason, this organization is only a good-looking fault, and I think the political situation of each country acts as a more important factor.